[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Multi-Threaded fork() correctness on Linux 2.4 & 2.6

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Smarduch Mario-CMS063 wrote:
> >
> > recently I've been involved in debugging MT forks on IA-64 the issues
> > found were related to the way IA64 does its TLB invalidation. But there
> > is still one issue that appears to be Linux in general related, and it
> > has to do with MT forks.
> >
> > For example a process has 3 threads T1, T2, T3.
> >
> > 1 - T1 issues a fork()
> > - under page_table_lock write bit is reset in src and dest pte's
> > 2 - T2 may have a TLB mis, the new write protected pte is inserted
> > (hw walker or sw tlb hdlr)
> > 3 - T2 winds up in do_wp_page() the page is copied to a new one
> > 4 - In the mean time T3 may be working off the same page, the
> > TLB invalidation (flush_tlb_mm()) has no occurred yet.
> > 5 - Eventually TLB is globally flushed so threads will see the new pte.
> > 6 - As a result the MT task may experience inconsisitent state.
> > - During 3 & 4. For example locks may be acquired by both
> > threads depending on the timing of the copy.
> I do think you've hit upon something interesting here. Though it's
> not quite as you describe. We don't have to wait for the flush_tlb_mm
> to sort it out: the flush_tlb_page in ptep_establish in break_cow in
> do_wp_page resolves the discrepancy much sooner. But your point is,
> that's already too late: T2 inserts a "smudged" copy of the page which
> T3 was working on, it does not contain all the data T3 had written there.


We hold the page_table_lock when doing the fork(), so T2 can't actually be
copying the page until we've done the TLB flush, no? And once the TLB
flush is done, all the writes by T3 should be in the page, so we copy the
right thing at that point, and there is no consistency problems?

No? What am I missing?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.069 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site