[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Pure 64 bootloaders
David S. Miller wrote:
>>agreed -- as far as i'm concerned the 32 bit libraries are there for
>>compatibility's sake and should be in /lib/compat/<subarch> instead of
>>/lib. the native libraries should be in /lib instead of /lib64. lib64
>>should just go away!
> 64-bit isn't any more "native" than 32-bit on some 64-bit platforms.
> 32-bit is the default and most desirable userland binary format on
> sparc64 for example. So 32-bit programs on sparc64 are as "native" as
> 64-bit ones might be considered.

that's true, i had forgotten about the sparc64 case. it really does slow
down tremendously when used in pure 64 bit mode

i would imagine this not to be the case for most architectures though.
possibly hppa is the same way. anyone with mips64 and ppc64 hardware out
there have any input?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-13 00:05    [W:0.166 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site