lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Tainted lsmod output
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > The one that puzzles me greatly isn't listed there: 'G'
> >
> > I guess it means GPL.
> >
> > It's just the opposite of 'P', whereas all of the others
> > have opposites of ' '.
>
> I guess the same, but doesn't it seem a strange kind of taint?

<tainted> has already been found to be non-0.
Looks like someone decided to reinforce the GPL-ness of
all modules at that point and that some other tainted flag(s)
should be set.

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-12 22:06    [W:0.130 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site