[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: List of things requested by lkml for reiser4 inclusion (to review)
Andrew Morton wrote:

>The type-unsafety of existing list_heads gives me conniptions too. Yes,
>it'd be nice to have a type-safe version available.
>That being said, I don't see why such a thing cannot be a wrapper around
>the existing list_head functions. Yes, there will be some ghastly
>C-templates-via-CPP stuff, best avoided by not looking at the file ;)
>We should aim for a complete 1:1 relationship between list_heads and
>type-safe lists. So people know what they're called, know how they work,
>etc. We shouldn't go adding things called rx_event_list_pop_back() when
>everyone has learned the existing list API.
>Of course, it would have been better to do this work as a completely
>separate kernel feature rather than bundling it with a filesystem. If this
>isn't a thing your team wants to take on now then yes, I'd be inclined to
>switch reiser4 to list_heads.
Vladimir spent 24 hours straight unsafing the lists in reiser4, and
didn't finish yet. We need 1-2 more days to address this before we can
submit reiser4. I hope this delay will not be too much of a problem.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-12 20:10    [W:0.097 / U:0.792 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site