[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: VM balancing issues on 2.6.13: dentry cache not getting shrunk enough

--Theodore Ts'o <> wrote (on Sunday, September 11, 2005 23:16:36 -0400):

> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:30:46PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
>> Do you have the /proc/sys/fs/dentry-state output when such lowmem
>> shortage happens ?
> Not yet, but the situation occurs on my laptop about 2 or 3 times
> (when I'm not travelling and so it doesn't get rebooted). So
> reproducing it isn't utterly trivial, but it's does happen often
> enough that it should be possible to get the necessary data.
>> This is a problem that Bharata has been investigating at the moment.
>> But he hasn't seen anything that can't be cured by a small memory
>> pressure - IOW, dentries do get freed under memory pressure. So
>> your case might be very useful. Bharata is maintaing an instrumentation
>> patch to collect more information and an alternative dentry aging patch
>> (using rbtree). Perhaps you could try with those.
> Send it to me, and I'd be happy to try either the instrumentation
> patch or the dentry aging patch.

Other thing that might be helpful is to shove a printk in prune_dcache
so we can see when it's getting called, and how successful it is, if the
more sophisticated stuff doesn't help ;-)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-12 08:20    [W:0.100 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site