[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Pure 64 bootloaders
    Andi Kleen wrote:
    > Jim Gifford <> writes:
    >>I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of
    >>linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no
    > Hopefully you're using /lib64 for that, otherwise your
    > packages will be incompatible to everybody else and not
    > FHS compliant. If you don't please don't submit any
    > patches to hardcode this to upstream packages.

    /lib64 is an awful scheme. I'd avoid it.

    Consider what happens in the existing scenario where you have capability
    to run both IA64 and x86-64 binaries on the same system.

    > The problem is that there is currently no defined protocol
    > for passing data to the 64bit part of the kernel, so while
    > it would be possible to write a boot loader that starts
    > a 64bit kernel it would be very kernel version dependent.

    Good point.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-09-10 10:41    [W:0.038 / U:55.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site