[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Pure 64 bootloaders
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jim Gifford <> writes:
>>I have been working on a project to create a Pure 64 bit distro of
>>linux, nothing 32 bit in the system. I can accomplish that with no
> Hopefully you're using /lib64 for that, otherwise your
> packages will be incompatible to everybody else and not
> FHS compliant. If you don't please don't submit any
> patches to hardcode this to upstream packages.

/lib64 is an awful scheme. I'd avoid it.

Consider what happens in the existing scenario where you have capability
to run both IA64 and x86-64 binaries on the same system.

> The problem is that there is currently no defined protocol
> for passing data to the 64bit part of the kernel, so while
> it would be possible to write a boot loader that starts
> a 64bit kernel it would be very kernel version dependent.

Good point.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-10 10:41    [W:0.064 / U:1.484 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site