[lkml]   [2005]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FW: [RFC] A more general timeout specification
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 16:32 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Joe Korty wrote:
> > > When you convert a user time to kernel time you can
> > > automatically validate
> >
> > Kernel time sucks. It is just a single clock, it may not have
> > the attributes of the clock that the user really wished to use.
> Wrong. The kernel time is simple and effective for almost all users.
> We are talking about _timeouts_ here, what fancy "attributes" does that
> need that are just not overkill?

Or rather, posix timers ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-09-01 17:14    [W:0.037 / U:3.524 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site