Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:27:08 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: GFS, what's remaining |
| |
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:49:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > - Why GFS is better than OCFS2, or has functionality which OCFS2 cannot > > possibly gain (or vice versa) > > > > - Relative merits of the two offerings > > You missed the important one - people actively use it and have been for > some years. Same reason with have NTFS, HPFS, and all the others. On > that alone it makes sense to include.
That's GFS. The submission is about a GFS2 that's on-disk incompatible to GFS.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |