lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GFS
Pekka J Enberg wrote:

> Sorry if this is an obvious question but what prevents another thread
> from doing mmap() before we do the second walk and messing up num_gh?

Nothing, I suspect. OCFS2 has a problem like this, too. It wants a way
for a file system to serialize mmap/munmap/mremap during file IO. Well,
more specifically, it wants to make sure that the locks it acquired at
the start of the IO really cover the buf regions that might fault during
the IO.. mapping activity during the IO can wreck that.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-08 20:35    [W:0.468 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site