Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:02:23 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: FYI: device_suspend(...) in kernel_power_off(). |
| |
Hi!
> There as been a fair amount of consensus that calling > device_suspend(...) in the reboot path was inappropriate now, because > the device suspend code was too immature. With this latest > piece of evidence it seems to me that introducing device_suspend(...) > in kernel_power_off, kernel_halt, kernel_reboot, or kernel_kexec > can never be appropriate.
Code is not ready now => it can never be fixed? Thats quite a strange conclusion to make. Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |