lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench 0.27
Date
After conducting some further research I've determined that cool n quiet has 
no effect on this "bug" if you can call it that. With the system running in
init 1, and cool n quiet disabled in the bios, a sleep(N>0) results in the
run_time value afterwards always being nearly the same value of ~995000 on my
athlon64, similarly, my server an athlon-tbird, which definitely has no power
saving features, hovers at ~1496000

Obviously since these values are nowhere near 10000, the loops_per_ms
benchmark runs forever, has anyone seen/read about sleep on amd machines
doing something odd? Can anyone else with an amd machine confirm this
behavior? Con: should we attempt to get the attention of LKML to see why amd
chips act differently?

--
Gabriel Devenyi
ace@staticwave.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-06 05:44    [W:0.080 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site