[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 3
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:59 pm, Jim MacBaine wrote:
> I just borrowed a power meter to see (or not to see) real effects of
> dyntick. The difference between static 1000 HZ and dynamic HZ is much
> less than I expected, only a very little about noise. With dyntick
> disabled at 1000 HZ my laptop needs 31,3 W. With dyntick enabled I
> get 29.8 W, the pmstats-0.2 script shows me that the system is at
> 35-45 HZ when it is idle.
> The power consumption difference between 250 HZ static and dyntick is
> below the noise, so maybe hardly worth all the struggle.

That's not the point. We want the power savings without sacrificing the extra
ticks if we need them.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-04 09:14    [W:0.076 / U:9.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site