Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:49:33 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC,PATCH] RCU and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT sane patch |
| |
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > The attached patch passes 20 hours of the internal-to-RCU torture test > > (see the code in the attached patch under CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST), > > which is a good improvement over last week's version, which would fail > > this test in less than two seconds -- this despite passing kernbench > > with flying colors and passing LTP 90% of the time. Sometimes there > > is no substitute for a good in-kernel stress test... > > > > The attached version of the patch seems to me to be ready for a larger > > audience. > > Cool! I've merged your patch to the -52-12 version of the -RT patch. You > can get it from the usual place: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ > > also, i've attached a port against 2.6.13-rc4. I have done this because > the PREEMPT_RCU patch in my tree is applied before the core-PREEMPT_RT > patch. I have fixed up the CONFIG_PREEMPT compilation branch and have > removed your #error define - it built and booted fine on an UP box but > there are no guarantees ...
Sounds great!!! I will give it a thorough hammering in both the CONFIG_PREEMPT and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT environments.
Thanx, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |