Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:49:06 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: KLive: Linux Kernel Live Usage Monitor |
| |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > the system, like load. A week running while I was on vacation doesn't > test much, a week running on a loaded server tests other things.
btw, I thought about adding the load average too but it wasn't really interesting, since sometime a server is stressed a lot for a few minutes and then goes back to idle mode. A kernel bug will not necessairly trigger because some app is I/O bound all the time. Certainly more load is a factor that increases the probability of bugs and race conditions though, it's just not obvious how to assign a 0/100% score to a certain KLive "session".
> The use will depend on how easy it is to install, patch and build isn't > easy. Crontab is. And I bet developers would be interested in how long
crontab really is easy and standard, crontab seems actually the only way I could really write the few liner autoinstall script. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |