lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.6.13-rt1
From
Date
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:34 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Have you tried turning on
> "Non-preemptible critical section latency timing" or "Latency tracing"

I just turned on the following:

CONFIG_CRITICAL_PREEMPT_TIMING
CONFIG_CRITICAL_IRQSOFF_TIMING
CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE

recompiled and booted. No problem here.

>
> I don't know if it's related to the PI changes, but I'm getting a crash
> with those on em64t .
>
> With both above options I get
>
> <0>init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8010ef44 rip ffffffff8010ef44 rsp 00007fffferror 5
> <0>init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8010ef44 rip ffffffff8010ef44 rsp 00007ffffffe8de8 error 5
>
> printed never ending right after init starts.
>
> If I only turn on "Non-preemptible critical section latency timing",
> then when I enter the command,
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency"
>
> The kernel will spit out a couple of max critical section updates , then
> it will hang silently.
>
> This is all new in 2.6.13-rtX . It could have just come in with 2.6.13 ,
> but I thought I'd mention it.

Did you try the latest patches I just sent. Mainly this last one on
-rt2? There is a deadlock that is fixed wrt the BKL.

-- Steve


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-31 03:13    [W:0.061 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site