Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:54:59 -0400 | From | Theodore Ts'o <> | Subject | Re: Dynamic tick for 2.6.14 - what's the plan? |
| |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:05:06AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:42, Christopher Friesen wrote: > > Lee Revell wrote: > > > The controversy over the introduction of CONFIG_HZ demonstrated the > > > urgency of getting a dynamic tick solution merged before 2.6.14. > > > > > > Anyone care to give a status report? Con, do you feel that the last > > > version you posted is ready to go in? > > > > Last time I got interested in this, the management of the event queues > > was still a fairly major performance hit. > > > > Has this overhead been brought down to reasonable levels? > > Srivatsa is still working on the smp-aware scalable version, so it's back in > the development phase.
Has there been an updated version of Thomas's C-state bus-mastering measurement patch?
- Ted
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |