[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kernel 2.6.13-rc7 Latency Question

    On 8/27/05, Justin Piszcz <> wrote:
    > These options are self-explanatory:
    > x x ( ) No Forced Preemption (Server) x
    > x x x ( ) Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop) x
    > x x x (X) Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) x x
    > It says 100 HZ or 250 HZ is good for SMP systems; however, what if I am
    > using a P4 machine with 1 CPU (HT), is 1000HZ still the way to go, as its
    > not really 2 *REAL* cpus?

    I use 1000HZ on my P4 machine, HT enabled, staircase scheduler.

    See LKML topic "Schedulers benchmark" if you want more
    information/benchmarks results.

    Michal Piotrowski
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-27 12:16    [W:0.024 / U:119.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site