[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
From: Andi Kleen <>
Date: 27 Aug 2005 04:34:07 +0200

> "David S. Miller" <> writes:
> > From: Alexey Dobriyan <>
> > Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:58:48 +0400
> >
> > > What's the point of having unlikely() attached to every possible if ()?
> >
> > If can result in smaller code, for one thing, even if it
> > isn't a performance critical path.
> Really? At least on x86 it tends to generate bigger code when
> block reordering is enabled because a jump forward and a jump
> backward and a possible label alignment are bigger than just
> a single jump forward.

In the cases I've studied on sparc64 it keeps gcc from doing basic
block replication in the unlikely paths.

I've only checked gcc-3.4 and earlier, gcc-4.x is just big bloated
useless garbage and should be avoided for a couple of years.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-27 04:56    [W:0.039 / U:32.024 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site