Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:32:08 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates |
| |
* James Morris (jmorris@namei.org) wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > > > This is based on Kurt's original work. The net effect is that > > LSM hooks are called conditionally, and in all cases capabilities > > provide the defaults. I've done some basic performance testing, and > > found nothing surprising. > > Do you mean nothing noticable?
I did only microbenchmarking, which was as much as double digit percentage faster (on P4), nothing was slower.
> > I'm interested to see numbers from others > > before I push this up. These are against Linus' current git tree (they > > will clash with the -mm tree). > > Are there any numbers for popular architectures like i386 and x86_64?
I'll have some numbers tomorrow. If you'd like to run SELinux that'd be quite useful.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |