[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
    "David S. Miller" <> wrote:
    > From: Andrew Morton <>
    > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:38:18 -0700
    > > I'm prety sure we fixed that somehow. But I forget how.
    > I wish you could remember :-) I honestly don't think we did.
    > The DEFINE_PER_CPU() definition still looks the same, and the
    > way the .data.percpu section is layed out in the
    > is still the same as well.

    Argh, can't remember, can't find it with archive grep. I just have a
    mental note that it got fixed somehow. Perhaps by uprevving the compiler
    version? We certainly have a ton of uninitialised DEFINE_PER_CPUs in there
    nowadays and people's kernels aren't crashing.

    Rusty, do you recall if/how we fixed the
    DEFINE_PER_CPU-needs-explicit-initialisation thing?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-08-18 06:16    [W:0.019 / U:9.308 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site