[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
"David S. Miller" <> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <>
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:38:18 -0700
> > I'm prety sure we fixed that somehow. But I forget how.
> I wish you could remember :-) I honestly don't think we did.
> The DEFINE_PER_CPU() definition still looks the same, and the
> way the .data.percpu section is layed out in the
> is still the same as well.

Argh, can't remember, can't find it with archive grep. I just have a
mental note that it got fixed somehow. Perhaps by uprevving the compiler
version? We certainly have a ton of uninitialised DEFINE_PER_CPUs in there
nowadays and people's kernels aren't crashing.

Rusty, do you recall if/how we fixed the
DEFINE_PER_CPU-needs-explicit-initialisation thing?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-18 06:16    [W:0.061 / U:1.220 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site