Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:20:56 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [git patches] IDE update |
| |
* Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> But! I used hdparm -t solely, 2.6 was always ~5% faster than 2.4. But > using -Tt slowed down the hd speed by about 30%. So it looks like some > scheduler interaction, perhaps the memory timing loops gets it marked > as batch or something?
to check whether that could be the case, could you try:
nice -n -20 hdparm -t /dev/hdc
does that produce different results?
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |