[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor
    hi Alexey,

    Thanks for the constructive comments.

    > And check for non-NULL data in at91_add_device_usbh() is useless:

    There are many more custom AT91RM9200-based boards. That NULL check is
    really just there to help the developers when they write their own
    board-XX.c file.

    > at91_wdt_ioctl() isn't __user annotated. Let alone it is ioctl.

    All the other watchdog drivers use ioctl? That is how it's described in

    > > + char* command = kmalloc(2, GFP_KERNEL);
    > Anyone remembers 1 kmallocated byte?

    That command buffer is passed down to the SPI driver, which then DMA's
    directly from/to it. We can't DMA to an address on the stack (atleast
    not in 2.4 when that driver was written).

    Andrew Victor

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-08 09:16    [W:0.019 / U:1.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site