Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Sat, 09 Jul 2005 08:27:15 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 23:30, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the > > /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement > > then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want > > to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions. > > JFTR: i second this. There is already enough hackery involved if one > wants to provide a smooth user experience ;-)
Consider it promised, and feel free to poke me if I forget! (That said, I won't now!).
Regards,
Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |