[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: reiser4 plugins
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:42:50 -0700, Hans Reiser <> said:

> Oh no, don't store the whole path, store just the parent list. This
> will make fsck more robust in the event that the directory gets
> clobbered by hardware error.

> I don't think it affects the cost of detecting cycles though, I think
> it only makes fsck more robust.

It doesn't affect the worst-case cost of detecting cycles; by necessity,
any (static [1]) directed cycle detection algorithm must take O(n) time,
n being the size of the tree (nodes + links). However, under
"reasonable assumptions" (where the reasonableness of those assumptions
may be questioned, but I think they're reasonable), I think that doing a
depth-first-search through the parent links makes the algorithm
not-too-terrible. Namely, the "reasonable assumptions" are that a node
doesn't have "too many" parents, and the filesystem hierarchy is not
"too deep".

[1] BTW, I had also previously looked at online/dynamic algorithms, for
those who are familiar with that area. The best known so far is still
O(n) worst case, but much, much smaller in "most cases".

Hubert Chan <> -
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at Encrypted e-mail preferred.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-08 18:43    [W:0.280 / U:4.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site