[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 for 2.6.12

> > Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You
> > removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.
> I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
> just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
> What would you like to see happen?

When/if suspend2 is merged and working, there's no reason to keep
swsusp around. So patches for removing swsusp1 are quite okay at the
end of series. OTOH it is one more patch for you to maintain, so... do
whatever you want.
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-07 21:32    [W:0.834 / U:5.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site