Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:15:25 +1000 |
| |
Hi.
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com> wrote: > > > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should > > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though. > > What would you like to see happen? > > Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing > it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.
I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to ram - just the suspend to disk part.
Regards,
Nigel -- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities. Be amazed that people believe it happened.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |