lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12
From
Date
Hi again.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You
> removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.

I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
What would you like to see happen?

Regards,

Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-07 02:34    [W:0.505 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site