[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [0/48] Suspend2 for 2.6.12
Hi again.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:22, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is swsusp1 expected to be functional after these are applied? You
> removed *some* of its hooks, but not all, so I'm confused.

I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
What would you like to see happen?


Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-07 02:34    [W:0.505 / U:1.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site