[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] securityfs
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:35PM -0500, wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH (
> > think it could be made even smaller if you use the default read and
> > write file type functions in libfs (look at the debugfs wrappers of them
> > for u8, u16, etc, for examples of how to use them.)
> The attached patch cleans up the securelevel code for the seclvl file.
> Is this a reasonable way to go about this?


> Or is there a better way to do this?

Look at how debugfs uses the libfs code. We should not need to add
these handlers to securityfs.


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-07 01:46    [W:0.090 / U:5.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site