[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01

    * Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:

    > because end_buffer_async_read/write use bit_spin_(un)lock and I do not
    > know how those interact with -RT.

    bit_spin_lock is preemptible too - but it's not a too nice construct.
    What seems to have happened in your trace is that local_irq_disable()
    was used too in combination with bit-spinlocks, and a spinlock was taken
    from within it. The best fix would be to get rid of bit-spinlocks ...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-31 12:46    [W:0.019 / U:2.652 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site