[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.13-rc4-V0.7.52-01

* Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:

> because end_buffer_async_read/write use bit_spin_(un)lock and I do not
> know how those interact with -RT.

bit_spin_lock is preemptible too - but it's not a too nice construct.
What seems to have happened in your trace is that local_irq_disable()
was used too in combination with bit-spinlocks, and a spinlock was taken
from within it. The best fix would be to get rid of bit-spinlocks ...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-31 12:46    [W:0.206 / U:48.296 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site