lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: hashed spinlocks
From
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:27:55 -0700

> >From 2.6.13-rc4 this hunk
>
> +#else
> +# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) NULL
> +# define rt_hash_lock_init()
> +#endif
>
> Doesn't work with the following,
>
> + spin_unlock(rt_hash_lock_addr(i));
>
>
> Cause your spin locking a NULL .. I would give a patch, but I'm not sure
> what should be done in this case..

That spinlock debugging code is such a pain in the butt,
nothing at all should be happening with spinlocks on
a non-SMP build.

We should just change the route.c ifdef to check for
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK as well as CONFIG_SMP, in order
to fix this.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-31 20:51    [W:0.225 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site