Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:46:13 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: hashed spinlocks | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:27:55 -0700
> >From 2.6.13-rc4 this hunk > > +#else > +# define rt_hash_lock_addr(slot) NULL > +# define rt_hash_lock_init() > +#endif > > Doesn't work with the following, > > + spin_unlock(rt_hash_lock_addr(i)); > > > Cause your spin locking a NULL .. I would give a patch, but I'm not sure > what should be done in this case..
That spinlock debugging code is such a pain in the butt, nothing at all should be happening with spinlocks on a non-SMP build.
We should just change the route.c ifdef to check for CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK as well as CONFIG_SMP, in order to fix this.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |