Messages in this thread | | | From | Willem de Bruijn <> | Subject | Re: status of kernel memory debugging? | Date | Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:12:06 +0200 |
| |
> UML is still too strange for valgrind, despite progress on both sides > (valgrind accepting more strange things and UML becoming less > strange). > > I tried grinding UML a month or so ago, and its use of clone was a > sticking point. >
I think I read your remark, yes. Thanks for the update; I hoped some strides had been made in that direction since then. Personally, I know to little about the topic to be of any use.
I guess the best option is then using slab caches per object type, so that I can at least find obvious memory leaks.
On a sidenote, it'll be interesting to see what valgrind reports once (if?) the kernel gets a good grinding.
Willem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |