[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module
    On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:53:17PM -0400, James Morris wrote:

    > It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM,
    > to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of
    > managing its own selinuxfs.

    Good idea. In the case of stacked modules each with a custom fs, having them
    be part of a common hierarchy makes a lot of sense.

    I'm assuming you are advocating for adding LSM support to provide some level
    of consistency in presentation rather than it _just_ being a new mount point
    for every module to live under?

    Take the discussion to the LSM list?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-03 21:17    [W:0.020 / U:1.852 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site