Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:09:14 -0700 | From | Tony Jones <> | Subject | Re: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module |
| |
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:53:17PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM, > to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of > managing its own selinuxfs.
Good idea. In the case of stacked modules each with a custom fs, having them be part of a common hierarchy makes a lot of sense.
I'm assuming you are advocating for adding LSM support to provide some level of consistency in presentation rather than it _just_ being a new mount point for every module to live under?
Take the discussion to the LSM list?
Thanks!
Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |