[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:53:17PM -0400, James Morris wrote:

> It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM,
> to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of
> managing its own selinuxfs.

Good idea. In the case of stacked modules each with a custom fs, having them
be part of a common hierarchy makes a lot of sense.

I'm assuming you are advocating for adding LSM support to provide some level
of consistency in presentation rather than it _just_ being a new mount point
for every module to live under?

Take the discussion to the LSM list?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-03 21:17    [W:0.131 / U:1.132 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site