lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> >Nick Piggin wrote on Thursday, July 28, 2005 7:01 PM
>
> >This clearly outlines an issue with the implementation. Optimize for one
> >type of workload has detrimental effect on another workload and vice versa.
> >
>
> Yep. That comes up fairly regularly when tuning the scheduler :(

in this particular case we can clearly separate the two workloads
though: CPU-overload (Ken's benchmark) vs. half-load (3-task tbench). So
by checking for migration target/source idleness we can have a hard
separator for wakeup balancing. (whether it works out for both types of
workloads remains to be seen)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-29 18:45    [W:0.066 / U:3.820 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site