[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Netlink connector
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:02:10AM -0400, James Morris ( wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
> >From: Evgeniy Polyakov <>
> >Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:14:55 +0400
> >
> >>Andrew has no objection against connector and it lives in -mm
> >
> >A patch sitting in -mm has zero significance.

That is why I'm asking netdev@ people again...

> The significance I think is that Andrew is trying to gently encourage some
> further progress in the area.
> I recall some netconf discussion about TIPC over Netlink, or more likely a
> variation thereof, which may be a better way forward.
> It's cool stuff

I read it quite long ago - I'm sure you do not want to use that monster
for event bus.
It was designed and implemented for heavy intermachine communications,
and it is quite hard to setup for userspace <-> kernelspace message bus.

> - James
> --
> James Morris
> <>

Evgeniy Polyakov
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-25 09:16    [W:0.073 / U:3.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site