[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 (ckrm)
On Gwe, 2005-07-22 at 12:35 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> I imagine you, like me, are currently sitting in the Xen talk,

Out by a few thousand miles ;)

> and I don't believe they are or will do anything so dumb as to throw away
> or lose information. yes, in principle, the logic will need to be

They don't have it in the first place.

> somewhere, and I'm suggesting that the virtualization logic should
> be in VMM-only code so it has literally zero effect on host-native
> processes. *or* the host-native fast-path.

I don't see why you are concerned. If the CKRM=n path is zero impact
then its irrelevant to you. Its more expensive to do a lot of resource
management at the VMM level because the virtualisation engine doesn't
know anything but its getting indications someone wants to be

> but to really do CKRM, you are going to want quite extensive interaction with
> the scheduler, VM page replacement policies, etc. all incredibly
> performance-sensitive areas.

Bingo - and areas the virtualiser can't see into, at least not unless it
uses the same hooks CKRM uses


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-22 21:06    [W:0.073 / U:2.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site