[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:02:36 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote:
> Okay, if you have no C2/C3 like the dump above shows, unloading usb
> will not help. It seems like your machine is simply not able to do
> reasonable powersaving.

Because of the CPU, ACPI implementation or because of kernel acpi
quality, x86_64 kernel quirks or...? It seems crazy that a modern CPU
like this should be so backwards as to not implement sleep states. It
being in a notebook and all. I blame intel kernel hackers ;-)

Mats Johannesson
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-22 20:35    [W:0.033 / U:18.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site