Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:33:27 +0200 | From | Voluspa <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference |
| |
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:14:32 +0200 Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 7/21/05, Voluspa <lista1@telia.com> wrote: [...] > > > Ok, so with an idle machine, different HZ makes no noticeable > difference, but I'd suspect things would be different if the machine > was actually doing some work.
I first thought about loading with a loop of md5sum /somedir, play a wav, fetch a couple of webpages etc. But since the talk has been that the powersave would come from CPU sleep between "ticks" (I know, I know, it's not ticks) not having to wake up so often, I decided against a load.
> Would be more interresting to see how long it lasts with a light load > and with a heavy load.
I won't do that unless heavily beaten ;-) The battery charge time is 2h10 minutes...
Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |