lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:14:32 +0200 Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 7/21/05, Voluspa <lista1@telia.com> wrote:
[...]
> >
> Ok, so with an idle machine, different HZ makes no noticeable
> difference, but I'd suspect things would be different if the machine
> was actually doing some work.

I first thought about loading with a loop of md5sum /somedir, play a
wav, fetch a couple of webpages etc. But since the talk has been that
the powersave would come from CPU sleep between "ticks" (I know, I know,
it's not ticks) not having to wake up so often, I decided against a
load.

> Would be more interresting to see how long it lasts with a light load
> and with a heavy load.

I won't do that unless heavily beaten ;-) The battery charge time is
2h10 minutes...

Mvh
Mats Johannesson
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-21 20:37    [W:0.085 / U:2.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site