Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:27:50 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: RT and XFS |
| |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:34:57PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > (I do disagree with Christoph on another point: i do think we eventually > want to change the standard semaphore type in a similar fashion upstream > as well - but that probably has to come with a s/struct semaphore/struct > mutex/ change as well.)
Actually having a mutex_t in mainline would be a good idea even without preempt rt, to document better what kind of locking we expect.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |