[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > That's like scratching your left ear with your right hand -- broadcasting
> > that external timer interrupt in the first place is more straightforward.
> > If you want to exclude CPUs from the list of receivers, just use the
> > logical destination mode appropriately.
> The problem with that is that it would need regular synchronizations
> of all CPUs to coordinate this. Not good for scalability and I
> believe the fundamentally wrong way to do this.

What to you mean by "regular synchronizations of all CPUs?" And how is a
broadcasted external timer interrupt different from a unicasted one
redistributed further via an all-but-self IPI, except from removing an
unnecessary burden from the CPU targeted by the unicast interrupt?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-18 12:50    [W:0.038 / U:1.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site