lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10?
Hi!

> Why can't I expect SWSusp work better and more reliable from release to
> release?

Patches welcome. Or employ someone to do swsusp development for you.

> Some possible things that could help:
>
> *Addopt a no-regressions-allowed policy and everthing stops until any
> identified regressions (in performance, functionally or stability) is fixed
> or the changes are all rolled back. This works really well if in addition
> organized pre-flight testing is done before calling a new version number.
> You simply cannot rely on ad-hock regression testing and reporting. Its got
> too much latency.

This would also mean "no development at all".

> * assign validation folks that the developer need to appease before changes
> are allowed to be accepted into the tree.

So... get me someone to test swsusp in each -rc and -mm
release... that would help. If you can't provide the manpower, why are
you whining?

Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-16 16:03    [W:0.044 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site