[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt

    On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Russell King wrote:
    > Umm. Except, according to your description of what it's supposed to
    > do, the above code can have an accumulating error.

    No. It can have a local drift, but the point is, the error never gets
    worse - it _stays_ local.

    There's no point in polling twice in immediate succession just because a
    sleep overslept. That's like a security guard testing each door twice for
    being locked, just because he overslept one round. Pointless.

    But what matters is that you don't let your local errors accumulate into
    the big picture.

    Now, if somebody wants to make nicer helper functions so that you can say

    timeout = ms_from_now(500);

    or something instead of saying "timeout = jiffies + HZ/2", then hey, go
    wild. At that point it's just syntactic sugar, and maybe it's worth it.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.021 / U:40.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site