lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ondemand cpufreq ineffective in 2.6.12 ?
I find the ondemand governor works as expected with 2.6.12 on my
Athlon64 Winchester [1]; as soon as I bzip2 a file, processor freq is
pinned at 1.8GHz and drops to 1GHz when idle.

--- [1]

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 31
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 1004.646
cache size : 512 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips : 1988.83
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp

Ken Moffat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the ondemand governor on athlon64 winchesters for a few
> weeks. I've just noticed that in 2.6.12 the frequency is not
> increasing under load, it remains at the lowest frequency. This seems
> to be down to something in 2.6.12-rc6, but I've seen at least one report
> since then that ondemand works fine. Anybody else seeing this problem ?
>
> Testcase: boot (my bootscripts set the governor to ondemand), set the
> governor to ondemand, performance, powersave and untar a nice big
> bzip2'd tarball (gcc-3.4.1) from an nfs mount. All using the config from
> 2.6.11.9 and defaults for new options.
>
> kernel 2.6.11.9 2.6.12-rc5 2.6.12-rc6 2.6.12
>
> ondemand 20.8 sec 21.3 sec 33.9 sec 34.1 sec
> performance 21.3 sec 22.0 sec 22.6 sec 20.1 sec
> powersave 32.4 sec 33.1 sec 33.6 sec 33.9 sec
>
> I don't have confidence that the numbers are more repeatable than +/- 2
> seconds on this, they just illustrate that ondemand used to give a
> similar time to performance, but now doesn't. Other intermediate and
> later tests have been omitted for clarity, but 2.6.12.2 does show the
> same problem.
>
> Since 2.6.12-rc6, 'ondemand' appears to be still accepted (the echo to
> scaling_governor returns 0, and the displayed frequency drops back if
> I try going from performance to ondemand).
>
> When ondemand appears to work properly, /proc/cpuinfo shows the speed
> jumping to 2 GHz, then falling back to 1.8 after the untar ends, then
> back to 1.0 GHz. In the problem cases, the speed remains at 1GHz.
>
> As far as I can see, nothing untoward shows in the logs. Any
> suggestions, please ?
>
> Ken
___
Daniel J Blueman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-12 13:16    [W:0.027 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site