Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:05:39 -0600 | From | Andreas Dilger <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] fs/jbd/: possible cleanups |
| |
On Jul 13, 2005 00:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 04:32:44PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > I don't mind removing this function, but it shouldn't be put inside #ifdef > > JBD_DEBUG, as that would remove the check from the compiler-parsed code > > and defeat the purpose of the check. > > That's not what my patch is doing. > > journal_init() is not inside an #ifdef JBD_DEBUG.
My bad. You didn't generate diff with -p (which I normally do and is incredibly useful when reviewing patches) and I saw "write_jbd_debug()" above and my brain went on autopilot assuming the code had moved into that function. Objection withdrawn.
Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |