[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt
--Lee Revell <> wrote (on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:24:59 -0400):

> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 21:30 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> Exactly what problems
>> *does* it cause (in visible effect, not "timers are less granular").
>> Jittery audio/video? How much worse is it?
> Yes, exactly. Say you need to deliver a frame of audio or video every
> 5ms.

Ummm. that's a 200HZ refresh rate, is it not? That seems unreasonable
(to a lay-person, as far as video goes).

> You have a rendering thread and a display thread that communicate
> via FIFOs. The main thread waits in select() for the next frame to
> complete rendering or for the deadline to expire. That's next to
> impossible with HZ=100, because the best you can do is the deadline
> +-10ms. With HZ=1000 it's no problem.

So if we have a 50HZ refresh rate, and a HZ rate of 250 or 300, it'll
work fine then, right? I know that's actually some error in the timers,
so it may be 2 or 3 ticks, not 1, but if we're running HZ at 5 or 6
times the frequency of video, presumably that'd still work fine?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-12 17:03    [W:0.186 / U:13.132 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site