[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again
    Jim Crilly wrote:

    > But in most of the changesets on the bkbits site you can go back over 2
    > years and not see anything from namesys people. Nearly all of the fixes
    > commited in the past 2-3 years are from SuSe.

    So, for the sake of argument, if IBM were to drop official support for JFS,
    we'd yank JFS out of the kernel even if there was someone else willing to
    support it? Why does it now *matter* who supports it, as long as its being
    maintained? And will we now block IBM's hypothetical JFS2 from the kernel
    if IBM, from the programmers up to the CEO, doesn't swear on their momma's
    grave that they'll continue to support JFS1, even if JFS1 is being
    supported by others? Jeez, this is why it doesn't take a kernel dev to see
    the problems here, common sense seems to be an increasingly rare ingredient
    in these arguments against R4. If I didn't know better, I'd think you were
    making this stuff up as you went along....

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-11 02:09    [W:0.020 / U:2.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site