[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] capabilities not inherited
    * Alexander Nyberg ( wrote:
    > btw since the last discussion was about not changing the existing
    > interface and thus exposing security flaws, what about introducing
    > another prctrl that says maybe PRCTRL_ACROSS_EXECVE?

    It's not ideal (as you mention, mess upon mess), but maybe it is the
    sanest way to go forward.

    > Any new user-space applications must understand the implications of
    > using it so it's safe in that aspect. Yes?

    At least less-likely to surprise ;-)

    Linux Security Modules
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-09 00:02    [W:0.025 / U:2.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site