Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Stable 2.6.x.y kernel series... | Date | Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:26:40 +0100 | From | (Nick Craig-Wood) |
| |
In linux.kernel, you wrote: > On Gwe, 2005-06-03 at 23:43, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Just wanted to say in public that I think the stable 2.6.x.y kernel > > series is working out quite well. Kudos to the stable@kernel.org team > > for a job well done. > > Ditto, and its been conservative enough that not only does it stay > pretty stable (one partition slip-up so far is very good indeed) its > small enough that most of the add on patches people use aren't breaking > against it either.
Hearty agreement from me.
The next hurdle for 2.6.11-stable is to make sure that everything that went into it goes into 2.6.12. Is there a procedure for that?
-- Nick Craig-Wood <nick@craig-wood.com> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |