[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes, it's supposed to be used for user-space PI too. What do you mean by
> 'completely bounded'. Do you consider the current worst-case O(100)
> property of plists a 'completely bounded' solution?
> i dont think fusyn's should be made available to non-RT tasks. If this
> restriction is preserved then fusyn's would become O(max_nr_RT_tasks)
> too.

I think making fusyn RT tasks only would be asking a lot. Fusyn
replaces Futex, and they are both used in pthreads. So non-RT tasks
wouldn't be able to use pthreads in userspace, or a big chunk of pthread


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-06 17:10    [W:0.062 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site