Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes | Date | Mon, 6 Jun 2005 00:44:45 -0700 | From | "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <> |
| |
>From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mingo@elte.hu] > >so the question is - can we have an extreme (larger than 140) number of >RT tasks? If yes, why are they all RT - they can have no expectation of >good latencies with a possible load factor of 140!
In practice, didn't we want most tasks to behave like RT? (for interactivity purposes) -- I recall hearing that's basically what good interactivity meant; short reponse times to events.
So then, taking await batch/bacground data-munching jobs, we fold back to needing a good RT-like behaviour. And then we can reach > 140.
-- Inaky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |