[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 10:32 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 17:53 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > >
> > I already released a patch to fix this.
> Nice to know. Where ?

Ingo pointed me at the patch.

Sorry, but I really don't see the release there.

> The first time I saw these latencies I has the PI abstraction applied, and
> the most recent time I had the attached patch applied only. This patch is
> small so I'm not sure if it could have that type of effect on task
> latency.

It fixes a problem and uncovers others, but your comment is more a
question than an explanation for the urgency of the fix. In fact the
original implementation leads to solid deadlocks in
plist_for_each_safe() loops.

I really can't blame Ingo for ignoring this.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-05 12:56    [W:0.079 / U:8.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site